Wikileaks, How do you access in Australia

[hoaky]

US cybercom at Bilderberg. Get ready for the war on cyberspace. Expect Homeland Security

Global Elites Meet Behind Closed Doors: Full Bilderberg 2011 Attendee List

Alexander, Keith B., Commander, USCYBERCOM; Director, National Security Agency

http://globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=25248

the smoke

LulzSec Takes Down Cia.gov

"Nope. This is not an Onion headline. Go ahead. Try it out. http://www.cia.gov" ...dont try it, its back up now. No idea who Lulzsec is

http://www.zerohedge.com/article/lulzsec-takes-down-ciagov

CIA website goes down, hackers claim responsibility
http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/06/16/...E75E6JC20110616

and mirrors

A Jesuit author lauds hackers' philosophy of creativity and sharing and praises Wikipedia

http://www.techworld.com.au/article/382267...itates_hackers/

Cyberattacks disclosed as federal security law considered

The timing is no coincidence, some cybersecurity analysts say. After two previous bills went nowhere, the White House needs to garner public support for a new law that could equip America for cyberwarfare.

Recent disclosures of cyberattacks against the International Monetary Fund, Google and several defense contractors coincided with an unprecedented pronouncement last week by CIA Director Leon Panetta, who warned a U.S. Senate panel that the U.S. needs to take "defensive measures as well as aggressive measures" to win at cyberwarfare

The bill is gaining bipartisan support in Congress. It would establish a framework for distributing billions of dollars for new cybersecurity systems, while placing responsibility for securing cyberspace with the Department of Homeland Security.

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2011-06-...eats-rise_n.htm

[henrietta]

Posted this on the " English as she is spoke " thread. Probably more appropriate here.

Oh my ears and whiskers .......... the delicious irony of it all ........

Assange complains about police " leaks " ..... is he for real ?????


http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/w...q-1225973443379

Cheers
J

[Mungo]

In Reply To: hoaky's post @ Dec 16 2010, 06:22 PM

One of the few BRAINS in the western world. Unfortunately we are out numbered.

[hoaky]

In Reply To: Mungo's post @ Dec 15 2010, 10:12 PM

From the jedi master
"Some Questions To Consider" Ron Paul Defends WikiLeaks "Killing The Messenger For Bad News"

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GDp1izlMQT0...feature=related

[Mungo]

In Reply To: hoaky's post @ Dec 15 2010, 07:27 PM

Amnesty International is reviewing Armstrong's case and human rights violations, hopefully they have the spine to raise the awareness of the persecution that this man has been put through by Uncle Sam

in the home of the free and the land of the brave

[hoaky]

In Reply To: Mungo's post @ Dec 15 2010, 07:26 AM

Sarah Palin is likely to be next president (dont cry for me...) and martin armstrong will still be in jail. And they're trying to spread this kind of democracy like it were 'I cant believe its not butter'.
This secrecy, given the government/corporate fusion is anti free market. Giant monopolies are being created. We need a teddy bear.

[Mungo]

Unfortunately so true.

http://www.martinarmstrong.org/files/Savin...2012-7-2010.pdf

[triage]

In Reply To: triage's post @ Dec 13 2010, 10:15 AM

Here is remarkably clear-headed and succinct commentary from some Harvard dude. For every Sarah Palin the yanks come up with for us foreigners to snigger and laugh at, they also manage to produce thinkers of the quality of this chap.

http://www.lawfareblog.com/2010/12/seven-t...s-on-wikileaks/

[triage]

In Reply To: hoaky's post @ Dec 4 2010, 04:07 PM

As someone who has not really bought into the wikileaks frenzy I found this documentary by Swedish tv to be informative.

It is cut into 4 bits for youtube with links to the 2nd 3rd and 4th bit to be found on the right hand side of this link.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NhTfOL9_HBE...feature=related

If that does not work just search wikirebels - the documentary on youtube.

Funny how much of the official reaction is directed at Julian Assange and Wikileaks rather than the concept of transparency. I liked the ending comment that "democracy without transparency is not democracy. It's just an empty word". I'm having difficulty differentiating the reaction of the US establishment to wikileaks and the reaction of the Chinese government to the recent awarding of the Nobel Peace Prize.

[hoaky]

In Reply To: Dave_vic_ozz's post @ Dec 4 2010, 11:51 AM

Can't take a leak

"The website was forced to turn to Switzerland for a new domain name after its original wikileaks.org address was shut down by an American provider, while Paris tried to ban French servers from hosting it.
The Swiss address was out of service late on Friday after the domain name was blocked by the US system provider, but WikiLeaks popped up on more than 20 alternative websites...Amazon booted WikiLeaks off its computer servers on Wednesday following pressure from American politicians, and a day later a group of US senators introduced legislation to make it illegal to publish the names of informants serving the nation's military and intelligence community.
Russia has also been upset by leaks branding it a virtual "mafia state" and President Dmitry Medvedev derided as a "Robin" to Prime Minister Vladimir Putin's "Batman".

At a press conference on Friday with visiting Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi - himself a target of some of the cables - Medvedev said the cables illustrated the "cynicism" of US foreign policy."

http://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/a/-/world...to-stay-online/